Show Notes
Pilgrim C et al., PNAS - A minimal analytical model shows that whether animal groups adopt distributed low-level vigilance (many-eyes) or concentrated high-vigilance roles (sentinels) depends on how individual vigilance costs scale with effort. The same dichotomy appears in selfish and cooperative groups and explains switching, edge effects, and turn-taking. Key terms: collective vigilance, many-eyes, sentinel behavior, vigilance costs, behavioral ecology.
Study Highlights:
The authors derive a minimal model where collective vigilance benefit is a function of summed individual vigilance and costs depend on individual effort. When vigilance costs are convex (steepening) many-eyes strategies with equal low vigilance across individuals are optimal; when costs are concave (flattening) sentinel strategies with vigilance concentrated in one or a few individuals are optimal. This outcome holds in both selfish (game-dynamic) and cooperative (group-optimal) contexts and is supported by simulations. Extensions reproduce behavioral switching with S-shaped costs, edge effects from heterogeneous costs, and turn-taking when energy state dynamics are included.
Conclusion:
The curvature of individual vigilance costs determines whether groups distribute vigilance across many members or concentrate it in sentinels; habitat structure that creates flattening costs (vantage points) favors sentinels, while uniform habitats with steepening costs favor many-eyes.
Music:
Enjoy the music based on this article at the end of the episode.
Article title:
Many-eyes and sentinels in selfish and cooperative groups
First author:
Pilgrim C
Journal:
PNAS
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.2536017123
Reference:
Pilgrim C, Bate AM, Sigalou A, Aellen M, Morford J, Warren E, Krupenye C, Biro D, Mann RP. Many-eyes and sentinels in selfish and cooperative groups. PNAS. 2026;123(33):e2536017123. doi:10.1073/pnas.2536017123
License:
This episode is based on an open-access article published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) – https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Support:
Base by Base is independent and ad-free — no sponsors, no paywall. If an episode was worth your time, chip in and keep the papers audited and the original songs coming:
❤️ Support monthly: https://buy.stripe.com/cNifZhclVebvagk2JDgEg01
☕ One-time donation: https://donate.stripe.com/7sY4gz71B2sN3RWac5gEg00
More at basebybase.com
On PaperCast Base by Base you'll discover the latest in genomics, functional genomics, structural genomics, and proteomics.
Episode link: https://basebybase.com/episodes/many-eyes-or-sentinels-cost-curvature-vigilance
QC:
This episode was checked against the original article PDF and publication metadata for the episode release published on 2026-08-19.
QC Scope:
- article metadata and core scientific claims from the narration
- excludes analogies, intro/outro, and music
- transcript coverage: Audited the transcript sections describing the minimal model fi = b(S) − c(vi); S = ∑vi; cost-curvature (convex vs concave); environmental structure; selfish vs cooperative results; behavioral switching (sigmoidal costs); edge effects; turn-taking; energy-state dynamics; and discussed limitations.
- transcript topics: Model of collective vigilance (fi = b(S) − c(vi)); Cost curvature and environmental structure (convex vs concave); Selfish vs cooperative group outcomes; Behavioral switching with sigmoidal costs; Edge effects and spatial positioning; Energy-state dynamics and turn-taking
QC Summary:
- factual score: 10/10
- metadata score: 10/10
- supported core claims: 6
- claims flagged for review: 0
- metadata checks passed: 4
- metadata issues found: 0
Metadata Audited:
- article_doi
- article_title
- article_journal
- license
Factual Items Audited:
- fi = b(S) − c(vi) and S = ∑ vi
- b(S) is increasing and saturating; 0 ≤ b(S) ≤ r
- c(vi) is increasing with c(0) = 0; costs scale with vigilance
- Uniform habitats yield convex (steepening) costs; structured habitats with vantage points yield concave (flattening) costs
- The dichotomy (many-eyes under convex costs; sentinel under concave costs) holds for both selfish and cooperative groups
- Edge effects: peripheral individuals show higher vigilance due to geometry
QC result: Pass.
